Saturday, February 6, 2016

Fly Sparging vs Batch Sparging

www.brew-boss.com Electric Homebrew Equipment


To the new #homebrewer, understanding the differences between batch sparging and fly #sparging can be confusing. For the seasoned masher, deciding which is a better process for your homebrewing set-up can be an even greater challenge.


What is Sparging?

Sparging is part of the mashing process in homebrewing. After the initial mash step, sparging is used to rinse the grain bed of as much sugar as possible for the most efficient mash. The tricky part is sparging in such a way that the maximum amount of sugars are extracted and lautered into the boil kettle without bringing along tannins from grain husks which show up in beer as unpleasant astringency.

For both batch and fly sparging, it is important to keep sparge water temperatures between 165-170°F (74-77°C) to reduce tannin extraction while still effectively rinsing the grains. Now let’s look at the two most common sparging methods.


Fly Sparging




Also known as continuous sparging, fly sparging is a method used by most commercial breweries and all-grain homebrewers. Commercial brewers fly sparge largely due to the claim that the method has higher efficiency than other sparge methods. While a few points difference in efficiency may not mean much to a homebrewer, commercial brewers are trying to make high quality beer at an affordable price, so higher efficiency means less malt is needed, and ultimately less money spent.

However, fly sparging takes considerable time and requires some special equipment. The process is conducted by slowly sprinkling sparge water evenly over the top of the grains while the mash is slowly lautered into the boil kettle. This process of continually adding the sparge water while also lautering is where the name “continuous sparging” derives.

The entire process can take anywhere from a half hour to two hours and requires the ability to pump sparge water into a device known as a “sparge arm,” which is rigged to evenly distribute sparge water over the top of the mash kind of like a shower head.

The depth of the grain bed is crucial in successful fly sparging, along with the rate of flow and even distribution of sparge water. Too shallow of a grain bed will cause wort to come out murky as there is not enough grain to settle and act as a filter. Too deep of a grain bed can cause the dreaded stuck sparge. Generally, 4-8 inches is ideal. Flow rate is also important. If the flow is too fast it can create a vacuum around the false bottom that will also cause a stuck sparge. The flow should be about a trickle and ideally the sparge water is being added at about the same rate as the wort being lautered out of the mash and into the boil kettle.


Batch Sparging


Batch sparging is, for the most part, strictly a homebrewing method. However, batch sparging is likely a descendant of “parti-gyle” mashing, which was a technique popular in England during the 19th century. Parti-gyle brewing is the process of completely draining the mash and using those runnings for one beer, while using the sparge runnings for other beers. Batch sparge uses the same general method of completely draining the mash before sparging, but all the runnings are combined in the boil kettle to be transformed into one beer.

Homebrewers have taken a liking to batch sparging because it requires minimal equipment to conduct and takes considerably less time, compared to fly sparging. All you need in addition to your extract equipment is a cooler converted into a mashtun and an extra pot to heat up the sparge water.

After the mash is complete, collect a few pitchers of wort and slowly add it back to the mash tun to promote a settled grain bed that will act as a wort filter. Once the bed is settled, lauter the wort entirely into the boil kettle, shut the valve of the mash tun, add in the sparge water and stir. After 10 minutes or so, collect all the sparge into the same boil kettle as the mash wort. Some people do one sparge step, others do multiple.

As mentioned in the fly sparging section, batch sparging is said to have lower efficiency than continuous sparging, but for homebrewers making 5-15 gallon batches, it really isn’t much of a difference to grab some extra grain. Some homebrewers would also dispute that the difference even exists. Batch sparging can also fall victim to stuck sparge, especially when gummy malts like wheat are involved. Using these techniques toavoid or fix a stuck sparge can remedy the headache.

So Which Should You Choose?

Both sparge methods have their ups and downs, and either can lend themselves perfectly to a homebrewing setup.

Fly sparging might be best for those homebrewers making larger batches in order to save a little cash on ingredients. Prospective pro-brewers who are honing skills as homebrewers may also benefit from continuous sparging since this is typically the method used by commercial breweries.

Batch sparging, on the other hand, is great for the all-grain newbie and homebrewer on a budget. The batch sparge process requires minimal equipment, only adds 10-20 more minutes of time to the mash process and leaves little room for major snafus.

In the end, it’s up to you which to pursue, but either way we’re glad you’re making your own beer at home! Tell us in the comments which sparge method you use and why!

Source: How to Brew by John Palmer

Thursday, February 4, 2016

Measuring IBU's in Beer

#homebrew #BrewBoss

As many of you know, the #alphaacids found in #hops are what is responsible for the hop flavor and bitterness in beer. Alpha acids, usually reported as a percent, is the variable most people use to calculate the #IBU of the beer they are making. It isn’t just one acid, the term “alpha acid” refers to a group of acids found in hop flowers that include humulone, adhumulone, cohumulone, posthumulone, and prehumulone. When hops are added to boiling wort, an isomerization happens in the boil and the alpha acids are converted to iso-alpha acids. Since the most common alpha acid is humulone, the most common iso-alpha acids are cis- and trans-isohumulone.



Isomerization of alpha acid humulone to iso-humulone

There are several ways to mathematically estimate what the IBUs of a beer are going to be based on the rough alpha acid concentration reported on the bag of hops you use. The three most popular calculations are the Rager, Tinseth, and Garetz equations. I personally use the Tinseth equation.


Tinseth Equation

I like the Tinseth equation because it takes into account the gravity of wort, which affects solubility of the acids. You can read all about that sort of thing on Greg’s page. Other calculations often ignore this factor, which could lead to significant differences in expected and resulting concentrations of alpha acid. I believe many online calculators use the Rager equation which also takes into consideration gravity of the wort.


Rager Equation

So while researching how to measure IBU, I found an old protocol from the 1960s on how to measured the concentration of iso-alpha acids (and therefore IBUs) of a beer. First, I ordered some 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane also known as isooctane.


Trimethylpentane

This method of measuring the amount of isomerized alpha acid in solution is not the current method used (I’ll write about that one later) but it is an older method that is easy to do. The principle here is to do an organic extraction of the beer. By mixing the isooctane with the beer, the two naturally separate, like oil and water. The isooctane “floats” on top of the beer but by vortexing the solution for seveal minutes, the organic components of the beer can be moved to the organic phase, the isomerized acids are soluble in the isooctane and get absorbed into that phase. Then the task becomes measuring how much alpha acid is in the organic phase. This was done by doing a spectra of the solution and measuring absorbance at 275 nm, a wavelength of light absrobed by the iso-humulone. Knowing that number and the extinction coefficent of iso-humulone, calculating the IBU was easy after there.

Protocol


  • In a 15 ml conical tube mix
  • 1 ml of beer (degassed)
  • 100 μl of 3 M HCl
  • 2 ml of iso-octane


Vortex for 2 minutes to make an emulsion of the organic and aqueous phases. This shaking allows for the extraction of the acid into the organic phase. Allow the phases to separate and remove organic phase. Read absorbance at 275 nanometers against reference of iso-octane.

Calculation is EBU (European bittering Units) = 50 * A275

I cannot locate it now, but the paper I was using for this protocol had a table that converted EBU to IBU. I tried to Google it but there seemed to be a disagreement online if there is a difference. The paper I was using was from the 60s so there was likely a correction added for the coversion from metric to English units. That is the likely difference although the numbers were really close. Once I find it, I will take a photo of the table and post it on here (hopefully tonight).

UPDATE: I found it.


Table comparing IBU and EBU

I decided to test three samples, two Galaxy saisons I’ve brewed recently and a homebrew from a friend that we both agreed was really bitter.
Homebrewed examples
Beer Calculated IBU A275 Measured IBU (EBU)

Galaxy Saison Dupont 40 0.946 39.6 (47.3)
Galaxy Saison Blaugies 35 0.900 37.4 (45)
Niciu IPA unknown 4.31 (crazy bitter beer) >150 (215)

The Niciu IPA, provided by a friend and fellow homebrewer, was made for an “unreasonably hopped” club competition for the DC Homebrewers. The original extraction reading was “out of range” for the instrument I was using, meaning it was higher than “3”. I made a 1 in 10 dilution of the organic and got a reading of 0.431….this is likely not an accurate reading for a few reasons but this is a crazy bitter beer, so I marked it in the table as >150, apparently it is out of the range I can detect.

It shouldn’t surprise me that my numbers were close to the deconvulated IBU numbers given by the table in the paper…I was surprised how close. I’m also quite shocked with the result of the Niciu IPA. I think one of the problems with this technique is the linear range and reproducibility. I’m going to test a lot more samples in the coming months but overall this is a relatively silly technique. It requires pipetting the same amount of isooctane into several samples, there are several variables that might affect the outcome of the extraction, such as temperature and time mixing. I tried to keep these things as similar as possible but even with just three samples I ended up with variation in the organic phase, the Niciu IPA had a precipitate on top of the organic phase. Obviously if this were a lab, the samples would be tested multiple times to get enough data to do some stats but I’m not going to bother.

I hope people found this interesting, I loved doing it. Hopefully I can research additional techniques for measuring hops contributions to beer and write about those as a follow-up.

“Some people wanted champagne and caviar when they should have had beer and hot dogs.” –Dwight D. Eisenhower
Source:
http://phdinbeer.com/2014/09/16/beer-chemistry-1-measuring-ibus-in-beer/

Tuesday, February 2, 2016

Happy Groundhog Day!

Stuck in a rut? Ready for a newer, better way to make your own beer? Then you are ready for the Brew Boss Electric Homebrew System! www.brew-boss.com



#homebrew #beer #EBIAB #electricbrewing

Saturday, January 30, 2016

Video: Brew Boss Tips and Tricks Managing Hot Break

#brewbossbrewing #homebrew #hotbreak Brew Boss Electric Homebrew Equipment



How to manage hot break with Brew-Boss electric homebrew system. This is why we love electric brewing! Try that with gas!

Friday, January 29, 2016

Spent Grain Pizza Dough Recipe

#brewboss #homebrew Brew Boss Electric Homebrew Equipment www.brew-boss.com
spent grain pizza dough
You’re relaxing after a long day. What could be better than a hot slice of pizza and a cold homebrew? What if the pizza slice was homemade? And what if that homemade pizza was made from #spentgrain pizza dough? Where’s the spent grain from? The homebrew you’re holding, of course. We’re going to call it a match made in heaven.

If you don’t homebrew, many breweries donate their spent grains, so just head over with a big bin and fill up!

A few notes before beginning:
  • Store the grains in a large pot or bin after mashing.
  • If you’re not going to use all the grains, you can store them in the refrigerator for later use to ensure they don’t get moldy.
  • When baking with spent grains, a good rule to convert any recipe to use spent grains is to take the amount of flour and convert no more than 25 percent of it to spent grains (with the exception of dog treats!).
  • Keep in mind that hops have been shown to be toxic to dogs. We recommend using gains that have not been in contact with hops—or keeping a close watch on your pups.

No-Knead Spent Grain Pizza Dough


Recipe provided by Amber DeGrace, which can be found in “New Life For Spent Grains,” May/June 2011 Zymurgy

Ingredients:
1 1/2 cups warm water
1 tsp yeast
3 cups flour
1/3 cup oil
3/4 cup spent grains

Directions:
  • In a bowl, sprinkle yeast over the warm water and set aside. In a large mixing bowl or stand mixer, add the flour and drizzle oil over. Work oil through flour with your hands or dough hook attachment until it resembles crumbs or small pebbles. Add the spent grains to the flour mixture and combine.
  • Gently stir the yeast and water mixture until combined. Add the yeast mixture to the bowl containing the spent grain mixture. Stir or mix with a dough hook until combined and a ball is formed. You may need to add flour, one tablespoon at a time. You’ll know it’s ready when the dough comes together and no longer sticks to the sides of the bowl.
  • In a clean bowl add a bit of oil to the bottom, put the ball of dough in, flip it over and cover. You can let it rise, covered with a dish towel, in a warm place until it has doubled in volume, or you can cover with plastic wrap and put in the refrigerator overnight.
  • Once the dough has risen, punch it down. This recipe will make enough dough for two pizza crusts, so I always halve it and put the second portion in a sealed freezer bag and toss in the freezer.
  • Preheat the oven to 500°F (260°C) while you’re preparing the pizza. Stretch the dough out on a pizza stone using your fingers until it is relatively round and thin.
  • Top with whatever you like. The sky’s the limit, especially for creative homebrewers. Some of favorites are prosciutto, egg, goat cheese and shrimp. Don’t pile the toppings on too thickly or the crust will remain a bit soft and soggy in the middle. Pop it in the oven for 8-10 minutes. You’ll know it’s ready when the crust has gotten crisp and the cheese is melted and bubbly.

Wednesday, January 27, 2016